User talk:DarwIn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DarwIn!

Hello DarwIn, should this file be renamed because of #2? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lotje Hello! Yes, I believe it should have a better name, indeed. What would you suggest? Darwin Ahoy! 21:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Darwin, guess: would File:Hippopotamus amphibius of Serengeti National Park.jpg be an option? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 03:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Lotje I would just add the date at the end, like " - 2007-08-18" - that helps a lot when you are looking for something in the cat, or just curating - and avoids disambiguation. Darwin Ahoy! 17:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done: Hippopotamus amphibius of Serengeti National Park. Lotje (talk) 02:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Bayerwerk Leverkusen Bei Nacht (70820365).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Superbass (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Solicitação[edit]

Bom Dia! Poderia verificar as últimas imagens que baixei na Wikipédia, já que elas foram marcas como "domínio público"? Luiz79 (talk) 12:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Paper Moon (25623569).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 11:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Guadec And Kit Poster Af Bof Veune (169441807).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alvar Aalto Vas Savoj (49195718).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 12:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Part of Gaza with an old Mohammedan cemetery in the foreground.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Part of Gaza with an old Mohammedan cemetery in the foreground.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

the 2023 board election of our group is run at

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.

The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are

  • October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
  • November 17 – December 10: Elections
  • December 16: Results announced

If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.

We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

All the best

--Ailura (talk) for the CPUG board

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Painted door (Photographer). Funchal, Madeira.jpg[edit]

You deleted the "Crackelure" category, citing the fact that there are no craquelures in the image. Take a closer look, please. There are a lot of craquelures around the door, and on the door itself there is a purposeful image of craquelure. -- Ввласенко (talk) 18:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ввласенко The wikipedia article describes that effect as "a fine pattern of dense cracking", something that can't be seen in any place of that photo. Just because the painting is falling away, it doesn't mean it's craquelure. Darwin Ahoy! 18:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ввласенко Hmm... Looking better, there is some craquelure in the lower part of the door, indeed... I added the category back. Darwin Ahoy! 18:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you. Let me note that geologists also use “craquelure” talking about mud cracks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mudcrack). Most broadly, the term refers to any pattern created by fractures, even at the scale of rock formations. The Wikipedia article is somewhat one-sided. -- Ввласенко (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ввласенко Thanks for the clarifications, and for pointing out the incorrect category removal. Darwin Ahoy! 21:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]